Slindon

image_print

General

The Slindon Cricket team (in the Arun district of Sussex) was famous in the middle part of the 18th century when it claimed to have the best team in England. The team was built around the Newland brothers among whom Richard was outstanding. He was an all-rounder who batted left-handed and became one of the greatest early cricketers and was famous throughout the 1740s. His brothers, about whom comparatively little is known, were Adam (born 1714) and John (born 1717). Another good player in the village, although he was an unsavoury one, was the notorious smuggler “Cuddy” whose real name was Edward Aburrow senior – his son became a regular in the Hambledon team of the 1770s.

The Duke of Richmond had been active as a player and patron since the 1720s and he lent his benevolence to the little woodland club near Arundel in the late 1730s when he became aware that its residents included three talented brothers, one of whom was showing signs of greatness, and a number of other very good players.

In fact Slindon was more of a Sussex County team than a village team, just as Dartford Cricket Club had always formed the nucleus of the Kent team. There can be little doubt that Richmond cast his net wide and that players from elsewhere in Sussex played for Slindon. But Richard Newland was the star and he was certainly local so it was perhaps natural that the name of the team, even if it were a Sussex County XI, should be that of Newland’s village.

The London Evening Post, advertising the match between Slindon and London at the Artillery Ground in September 1742, remarked that ‘the above Parish [Slindon] has played forty-three Matches and lost but one’. Sadly though only five matches involving Slindon are known of before this notice so there is a great deal about the club’s history which will probably never come to light. We do not know for instance, when it was founded. The village website says that Slindon ‘can unquestionably claim to have the oldest cricket club in continuous existence’, though, it mist be said, it does not go to any lengths to justify this. Certainly there no real evidence that Slindon was playing organised cricket much before 1740 (the present club’s Facebook page claims 1731 as the founding date) whereas teams from Mitcham and Croydon were playing matches more than twenty years before then. Also, I do not think that the continuous existence of a Slindon cricket team since that date has been demonstrated to be the case, though I may be wrong.

Also, it seems to be the case that none of the great matches took place on Slindon Common which was, reputedly, the teams home ground. Nevertheless, while it was thriving it was a strong contender for the title finest team in the land and its history is much to be celebrated.

1741 season

The first written record of the Slindon team is on 15 June 1741 when they played against Portsmouth at Stansted Park, Rowlands Castle, near Havant in Hampshire. Slindon won this match by 9 wickets. It is the earliest report of a match involving Slindon, though the club must have been playing for some time beforehand. The Duke of Richmond in a letter said that “above 5000 people” were present. In a second letter, he gives the result.

On Thursday 9 July 1741, in a letter to her husband, the Duchess of Richmond (1706 – 1751) mentioned a conversation with John Newland re a Slindon v East Dean match at Long Down, near Eartham, a week earlier. This seems to be the first recorded mention of any of the Newland family.

In two subsequent letters to his friend the Duke of Newcastle, a future Prime Minister, Richmond spoke about a game on Tuesday 28 July which resulted in a brawl with “hearty blows and broken heads”! The game was at Portslade between Slindon and unnamed opponents. Apparently, Slindon won the battle but the result of the match is unknown! Richmond had been involved in ruckuses of this sort before and it must not be forgotten that Georgian England was an essentially violent society. The famous “poor little Slyndon” phrase followed the game against Surrey at Merrow Down on 7 September 1741. Richmond in a letter to Newcastle before the game spoke of “poor little Slyndon against almost your whole county of Surrey”. Next day he wrote again, saying that “wee (sic) have beat Surrey almost in one innings”.

Soon afterwards, Richmond’s wife Sarah wrote to him and said she “wish’d….. that the Sussex mobb (sic) had thrash’d the Surrey mob”. She had “a grudge to those fellows ever since they mob’d you” (apparently a reference to the Richmond Green fiasco in August of the 1731 season). She then said she wished the Duke “had won more of their moneys”. So she could hardly be described as an admirer of Surrey….

1742 season

The fame of Slindon and the Newlands was established after this beating of Surrey. In August 1742, the report of a London v Croydon game at the Artillery Ground says that “the noted bowler from Slendon (sic) assisted Croydon”. This was probably Richard Newland although he was an all-rounder, not just a bowler.

In September, the Slindon team came to the Artillery Ground for probably the first time. London Cricket Club was pre-eminent in the game at that time and had dominated the 1730s. In the two matches on 6 and 10 September, London prevailed. They won the first game “with great difficulty” and then, apparently having been assisted by the weather which made the pitch unplayable, they won the second by 184 runs.

The enthusiasm generated by these matches cannot be overstated. Massive crowds attended and fortunes were gambled on the results and on individual performances. A report states that Slindon came to the Artillery Ground “having played 43 games and lost but one”. Richard Newland was heavily backed to score 40 runs off his own bat: a feat he failed to accomplish. It should be noted that pitch conditions in those days heavily favoured the bowlers and to score 40 then would be like making a century on a modern “flat track”.

A report states: “At the conclusion of the above (i.e., second) match Slindon offered to play another match against London either at Guildford or on the South Downs for £100, but the challenge was not accepted”.

1743 season

The only notable mentions of Slindon in 1743 are of Richard Newland personally for he consolidated his reputation as an outstanding single wicket performer.

1744 season

The London “Daily Advertiser” carried various notices from Thursday 31 May until Sunday 3 June which announced that two untitled sides would play in the Artillery Ground on Saturday 2 June. On 31 May, the paper said that the teams would consist of “four gentlemen from Slindon, one from Eastbourne, two from Hamilton (sic) in Sussex, one from Addington and three from Lingfield in Surrey” against “four gentlemen of London, one from Richmond, one from Reigate, three from Addington in Surrey, one from Bray Wick in Berkshire and one from Arundel in Sussex”.

The Duke of Richmond’s papers, which are now in the possession of the West Sussex Records Office, include a scorecard of the match – the earliest known in which individual and team scores are recorded.

We do not know which of the two Bryants or which of the two Bennetts took part. Both the Harris brothers, John and Joseph, were involved; and of the three Newland brothers it was John who did not play. Thomas Waymark was formerly employed by the Duke of Richmond but he is here given as a Berkshire resident and playing for the London XI. The match included a declaration by the Slindon team in their second innings at 102-6. They made 102 & 102-6d against London’s scores of 79 & 70. Slindon won by 55 runs.

In September, Slindon again played London at the Artillery Ground and won, but details including the margin of victory have not survived.

Having now defeated London twice, then came what has become known as the Slindon Challenge. They issued an press notice to say it would play any parish in England. London did not accept. Only Addington and Bromley were able to accept. Matches against these teams were arranged at the Artillery Ground: against Addington on 12 and 13 September; and against Bromley on 14 September. We know that rain intervened and no result or match report has survived of either game, even though they are known to have created huge interest.

1745 to 1749

The single wicket form of the game became increasingly popular in the latter half of the 1740s and and Richard Newland proved very adept at this form of the game.

On 5 July 1745, there was a match at the Artillery Ground between two “best elevens”, apparently organised by Robert Colchin and Richard Newland which was advertised as Sevenoaks, Bromley & Addington versus Slindon, Horsmonden, Chislehurst & London.

In the 1747 season, Slindon issued further challenges in the highly popular (and lucrative) “fives” version of the game. On Monday 6 July 1747, Five of Slindon played Five of Dartford at the Artillery Ground. This was the result of a challenge by Slindon, published in the “Daily Advertiser” on Mon 29 June, to play “five of any parish in England, for their own Sum”. The announcement advised interested parties: “If it is accepted of by any, they are desir’d to go to Mr Smith, who has Orders to make Stakes for them”. The three Newland brothers all played. “Mr Smith” was George Smith, keeper of the Artillery Ground. On Saturday 4 July, George Smith announced in the same paper that “five of Dartford in Kent, have made Stakes with him, and will play with the above Gentlemen at the Time and Place above mentioned for twenty Pounds”. Subsequently more five-a-side challenges took place on Wednesday 8 July against Bromley and then two matches on 10 July and 15 July against the strong Hadlow team from Kent.

1750s

The Duke of Richmond died on Wednesday 8 August 1750 and it could be said that Slindon died with him, especially as the Newlands were by now veteran players with their best years behind them. Richmond’s death, following that of his friend Sir William Gage in 1744, had a massive impact on the game in Sussex and the game as a whole was affected only a few months later when the Prince of Wales, another key patron, also died. An immediate slump ensued from this loss of patronage and then cricket was badly impacted by the Seven Years War from 1756 to 1763.

The last Slindon match we know of was a match on 21 and 22 June 1754 against Midhurst & Petworth on Bowling Green, Lavington Common. This was clearly a village match only. Slindon apparently lost by eight wickets and the match seems to mark the great little club’s swansong for it is not mentioned in the sources thereafter. Sussex cricket as a whole went into decline and, although a number of inter-parish games are reported over the next decade or so, it is not until 1766 that we again find a Sussex team in a major match.

References to Hambledon, particularly those in the works of G B Buckley, strongly suggest that Hambledon was the organiser of matches played not just by a Hampshire county team but by a combined Hampshire-Sussex team. A number of Sussex cricketers are known to have played for Hambledon during its glory days: one of them being Edward “Curry” Aburrow, son of the notorious Slindon smuggler; and another being none other than the club captain Richard Nyren, who was born in Sussex and was the nephew of the three Newland brothers.

Slindon Cricket today

The village has a cricket club which still plays on Slinden Common and claims continuity with the team of the glory days. Also there is a monument to Early Cricket at the entrance to the village.

The Glory Days recalled. Cover signed by the Sussex Team. I can spot England players David Smith, Ian Gould, Geoff Arnold, Ian Grieg and Tony Pigott.
Scroll to Top